You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have played around with it, and what's interesting is that 0: Range[0, 23] (without parentheses) seems to work (both in repl and scalac, tested on b1b1dfd):
However this only works up to a point as well, with 0: Range[0, 128] being the first one to break in the exact same manner as reported above. To me it all sounds like a stack overflow that is being incorrectly fallbacked into a type mismatch error.
Compiler version
3.2.0
Minimized code
Output
Expectation
At least
(0: Range[0, 23])
compiles. (The goal beingRangeL[0L, 4294967296L]
working forLong
s; can possibly splitRange
into more branches for that.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: