Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor Upgrades for Backend Dependencies #7782

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 13, 2024
Merged

Minor Upgrades for Backend Dependencies #7782

merged 8 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

fm3
Copy link
Member

@fm3 fm3 commented May 2, 2024

Steps to test:

  • CI should be enough

  • Updated changelog
  • Needs datastore update after deployment

@fm3 fm3 self-assigned this May 2, 2024
// Makes txw2 write self-closing tags in xml (which we want). Not imported.
"org.codehaus.woodstox" % "wstx-asl" % "4.0.6",
// Json Web Tokens (used for OIDC Auth). import pdi.jwt
"com.github.jwt-scala" %% "jwt-play-json" % "9.2.0",
"com.github.jwt-scala" %% "jwt-play-json" % "10.0.0",
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://github.com/jwt-scala/jwt-scala/releases says no breaking changes, just the play 3 upgrade

@fm3 fm3 changed the title minor upgrades for backend dependencies Minor Upgrades for Backend Dependencies May 2, 2024
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ class DataVaultTestSuite extends PlaySpec {
"returns failure" when {
"requesting invalid range" in {
val result = (vaultPath / dataKey)
.readBytes(Some(Range.Long(-10, 10, 1)))(globalExecutionContext)
.readBytes(Some(Range.Long(-5, -10, 1)))(globalExecutionContext)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Negative starts for byte ranges are now actually allowed in GCS. So we need to test an even more invalid range to check that a failure is indeed returned (this test is intended to check that no exceptions bubble up but instead the tryo turns them into Box.Failures).

@fm3 fm3 marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2024 12:39
Copy link
Contributor

@MichaelBuessemeyer MichaelBuessemeyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for bumping those dependencies 🎉

@fm3 fm3 merged commit e7b4eb5 into master May 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@fm3 fm3 deleted the bump-backend-deps branch May 13, 2024 09:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants