Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

broken link on 2.6 riak doc page #199

Closed
treaz opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

broken link on 2.6 riak doc page #199

treaz opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@treaz
Copy link
Contributor

treaz commented Feb 3, 2020

See riak-example for a minimal and standalone project containing the example in this guide.
https://github.com/scalatra/scalatra-website-examples/tree/master/2.6/persistence/riak-example does not exist

@treaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

treaz commented Feb 12, 2020

@takezoe @magnolia-k I've started work on an example for Riak and scalatra 2.7. However, I notice that the official Riak java client (the one used in the doc page) hasn't been updated since 2016. And the docs don't match the source code anymore (directory structure has changed and the imports don't work as specified). The other clients haven't been updated for 8-9 years.

In my world, this means discontinued projects. As I result, I would suggest we drop entirely the documentation page for Riak. What do you think about this?

@treaz treaz assigned treaz, takezoe and magnolia-k and unassigned treaz Feb 12, 2020
treaz pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2020
@magnolia-k
Copy link
Contributor

@treaz

I don't think it is necessary to update the code for Riak as a sample code from the maintenance status of Riak's Java Client.

(Because Scalatra doesn't have Riak-specific support function in the first place)

@treaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

treaz commented Feb 15, 2020

@magnolia-k shall we just remove the riak doc page then?

@takezoe
Copy link
Member

takezoe commented Feb 15, 2020

Also, I think there is no high demand for Riak doc due to the current status of Riak.
I think we can just remove Riak doc.

@treaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

treaz commented Feb 15, 2020

I have made a commit on branch 2.7 in which I removed riak docs starting from version 2.7. I'm closing this issue

@treaz treaz closed this as completed Feb 15, 2020
@takezoe
Copy link
Member

takezoe commented Feb 16, 2020

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants