Added request name to results variable passed to report (#354)

[hebertjulio]

Description

Show request names in the report.

Motivation behind this PR?

Requests for different purposes with the same paths.

What type of change is this?

Feature

Checklist

• I have added a changelog entry / my PR does not need a new changelog entry. Instructions.
• I have added/updated unit tests. Instructions.
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes. Instructions
• I have self-documented code my changes by adding docstring(s) and comment(s). Instructions
• Current PR does not significantly decrease the code coverage and docstring coverage.
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
• I have run ScanAPI locally and manually tested my changes. Instructions.

Issue

Closes #354

[camilamaia]

Awesome PR, thanks @hebertjulio !! I left some minor suggestions.

[camilamaia]

Screenshot to show how cool is the report with the change:

Thanks @hebertjulio !

[camilamaia]

⭐

[camilamaia]

@Pradhvan can I go ahead and merge the PR? Or do you have any suggestions/comments?

[hebertjulio]

I will resolve merge conflicts

[Pradhvan]

@hebertjulio left two minor reviews. The rest of the PR looks good to me. Great job 🤗

[camilamaia]

@hebertjulio @Pradhvan I am going to release a new version right now and I would love to have already this new feature on it. Can I add Pradhvan's suggestions and merge it? If we need more changes in the docstrings, we can open a new PR later. Is that ok?

[hebertjulio]

Of course @camilamaia , that's fine with me, thanks 😄