Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to deal with new extension! #1618

Closed
alinzm opened this issue May 11, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

How to deal with new extension! #1618

alinzm opened this issue May 11, 2017 · 5 comments
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).

Comments

@alinzm
Copy link

alinzm commented May 11, 2017

Hello, Everyone!

We are working on a website for ranking the airlines and airports. As we have no particular Schema for these topics, I am looking for some documents or help to know How can I make an extension to rate Airlines and Airports.

I look forward to hearing your fantastic ideas.
Best

@thadguidry
Copy link
Contributor

thadguidry commented May 11, 2017

Rank airlines / airports from all 3 perspectives.... Airline companies, Pilots, and consumers. Not just consumers.

@alinzm
Copy link
Author

alinzm commented May 11, 2017

We have our way to rank them include their Aeroplanes, Service, Price, etc. But I am wondering how I can use reviewed/hosted extension for this.

@RichardWallis
Copy link
Contributor

Firstly the question to ask is does this warrant the creation of an extension to do this or does the current vocabulary, with some examples, and possibly a few proposed tweaks satisfy your use case.

We have Review, Rating and
AggregateRating, which can be used to describe an Organization and or a Service These are currently being extended via issue #1589 with CriticReview and UserReview subtypes.

If you believe an extension would be needed to group together a set of types and properties to fully describe this, and similar, domains, I can recommend my three part "Schema.org in practice" article series: part 1, 2, and 3, plus the How We Work documentation to help guide your work.

@stuartasutton
Copy link

In addition to the recommendation of Richard's excellent three part guide, you can also check out the two webinars he did for DCMI (Dublin Core Metadata Initiative) on schema.org extensions. The first uses the bibiographic extension as an discussion example and the second is a more technical intro.

Part 1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlYNb7D9E94&t=13s
Part 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrnjO5zS_t0&t=3s

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is being tagged as Stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!). label Jul 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-issue-activity Discuss has gone quiet. Auto-tagging to encourage people to re-engage with the issue (or close it!).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants