Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disabling accessor setter when value resolution falls back to the property default value #1422

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023

Conversation

joaojacome
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
Doc updated no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets #1421
License MIT

@joaojacome joaojacome marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2022 12:32
@joaojacome
Copy link
Contributor Author

@goetas @scyzoryck please review :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@scyzoryck scyzoryck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@joaojacome Thanks for contribution! Do you think that it cause no breaking changes? Should we update documentation for this behavior?

Best, Marcin

@joaojacome
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello :)

So, the previous MR fixing the default value for constructors had a BC, and this MR is to fix that. BUT, this could be considered a BC regarding the last version.

@joaojacome
Copy link
Contributor Author

@goetas Can you take a look at this one?

Thanks!

@goetas
Copy link
Collaborator

goetas commented Jan 6, 2023

@joaojacome hi, I will! sorry for the delay

@goetas goetas closed this Feb 3, 2023
@goetas goetas reopened this Feb 3, 2023
@goetas goetas merged commit 402a126 into schmittjoh:master Feb 3, 2023
@joaojacome joaojacome deleted the fix-promotion-setter branch February 3, 2023 12:24
@annervisser
Copy link

@goetas any chance you could tag a release? We are currently unable to upgrade beyond 3.17.1 and this PR fixes that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants