New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
single precision support in moments functions #5344
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thank you @grlee77! I've suggested a couple of typo fixes, but this is otherwise fine by me. 👍
Co-authored-by: Juan Nunez-Iglesias <juan.nunez-iglesias@monash.edu>
I don't think it matters if we merge this one or #5219 first. I will just rebase the other as needed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @grlee77, I just left a suggestion, otherwise it looks good to me 😉
@rfezzani, please merge if this looks good to you know |
@grlee77 looks like the last change killed the CI... |
right, it should be fixed now |
🎉 sorry @grlee77 for being late 😕! Thank you again 😉 |
Co-authored-by: Juan Nunez-Iglesias <juan.nunez-iglesias@monash.edu>
Description
closes #5199
This PR continues the work started in #5200.
The first commit here is a cherry-pick of the
_supported_float_dtype
function introduced in #5219. We can rebase here once that PR is merged.Checklist
./doc/examples
(new features only)./benchmarks
, if your changes aren't covered by anexisting benchmark
For reviewers
later.
__init__.py
.doc/release/release_dev.rst
.