Update scipion-gui.rst

[brodriguezdefrancisco]

No description provided.

[brodriguezdefrancisco]

TO DO. “Queue” and “wait for” modifications

It is confusing how queue and wait for work.

Should be in a separate level:

I would change "Use queue" to “Use engine queuing system?”
change "wait for" to “Schedule protocol after”

"Queue interrogation mark" modify to:

Click Yes if you want to submit a single job per protocol to a batch-queuing system.
The queue commands to launch and stop jobs should be configured
for the current host in the /home/tomo/Software/scipion3/config/hosts.conf file.

“wait for” interrogation mark modify to:

Specify a comma separated list of protocol IDs if you want
that this protocol starts after the input protocols in the list
are finished. This function will allow you to "schedule" many
runs that will be executed after each other.

[pconesa]

Hi @brodriguezdefrancisco , the help for "wait for" it is actually the same as we have. there is no change. Is that correct?

https://github.com/scipion-em/scipion-pyworkflow/blob/devel/pyworkflow/utils/properties.py#L171

[brodriguezdefrancisco]

Hi @brodriguezdefrancisco , the help for "wait for" it is actually the same as we have. there is no change. Is that correct?

https://github.com/scipion-em/scipion-pyworkflow/blob/devel/pyworkflow/utils/properties.py#L171

That is correct. I couldn´t find any better way to say/explain it

[pconesa]

What about this:

Specify a comma separated list of protocol IDs if you want
to schedule this protocol and wait for those protocols to finish before
starting this one. This function will allow you to "schedule" many
runs that will be executed after each other. For more information see https://scipion-em.github.io/docs/release-3.0.0/docs/user/scipion-gui.html#waiting-for-other-protocols

[pconesa]

Relocating the elements in the form is possible but will take more time.

This is my suggestion bsaed on yours:

[brodriguezdefrancisco]

I thing it is good. I would change "runs" for "tasks". Sometimes I get confused with "protocols" because it has a sense of list of things, but it is a personal view (and it is in all workflows and difficult to change).

[brodriguezdefrancisco]

very nice Pablo 👍

[pconesa]

Yes, I kind of agree, buy "protocol" is all over the place.

[pconesa]

Thanks @brodriguezdefrancisco for improving Scipion and it's documentation.