Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC: improvement in scipy.interpolate.splprep #7073

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ashwinpathak20
Copy link
Contributor

Please look at my changes applied in accordance with the issue #6618 in scipy.interpolate.splprep.

@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ def splprep(x, w=None, u=None, ub=None, ue=None, k=3, task=0, s=None, t=None,
-----
See `splev` for evaluation of the spline and its derivatives.
The number of dimensions N must be smaller than 11.
Splprep pads zeros at the end which is a cross-link to BSpline as BSpline does not require zero-padding.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this sentence clarifies much.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then what should be added , I mean what should I focus upon ?

@pv pv added needs-work Items that are pending response from the author Documentation Issues related to the SciPy documentation. Also check https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org labels Feb 18, 2017
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ def splprep(x, w=None, u=None, ub=None, ue=None, k=3, task=0, s=None, t=None,
-----
See `splev` for evaluation of the spline and its derivatives.
The number of dimensions N must be smaller than 11.
The c array retruned consists of k+1 zeros at the end
while BSpline does not require zero-padding.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be useful to contrast it to splrep (does it zero-pad?)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, so should I include the that splrep does not zero-pad also in the docstring?

@ev-br
Copy link
Member

ev-br commented Jul 29, 2017

Thank you @ashwinpathak20 , your commits are squashed and merged in gh-7678. Your authorship is preserved :-)

@ev-br ev-br removed the needs-work Items that are pending response from the author label Jul 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Issues related to the SciPy documentation. Also check https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants