Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix limit with negative integer for SearchUtil #1627

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 21, 2021
Merged

Fix limit with negative integer for SearchUtil #1627

merged 4 commits into from Apr 21, 2021

Conversation

eheimbuch
Copy link
Member

@eheimbuch eheimbuch commented Apr 21, 2021 •
edited

Proposed changes

Fix limit with negative integer for search util.

Your checklist for this pull request

  • PR is well described and the description can be used as commit message on squash
  • Related issues linked to PR if existing and labels set
  • Target branch is not master (in most cases develop should bet the target of choice)
  • Code does not conflict with target branch
  • New code is covered with unit tests
  • Changelog entry file created in gradle/changelog

Checklist for branch merge request (not required for forks)

@eheimbuch eheimbuch added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 21, 2021
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 21, 2021

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 4 Code Smells

79.7% 79.7% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@pfeuffer pfeuffer merged commit 7579d91 into develop Apr 21, 2021
@pfeuffer pfeuffer deleted the bugfix/search_util_limit branch April 21, 2021 14:19
@pfeuffer pfeuffer mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pfeuffer pfeuffer pfeuffer approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@eheimbuch @pfeuffer