Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add example files for Rigol DS2072A scope. #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2020

Conversation

avian2
Copy link
Contributor

@avian2 avian2 commented May 14, 2020

Hi Scott,

sorry for the long delay. I finally got some time in the lab. Here are the example DS2072A captures I promised.

Both channels were connected to the calibrator output. The channels were set to
1x (default setup), but probes were 10x, so the square signal amplitude in the
files appears as 300 mV, not 3 V.

Captures 1 through 5 are using both channels using various time bases and
attenuator settings. Captures 6 and 7 use only a single channel.

Files were saved after a single trigger capture, so both .csv and .wfm
should have exactly the same data.

Most screenshots don't actually show the waveform, but the basic settings can
still be seen on them (as well as in the included .txt files). Not showing the
waveform in the screenshot .png seems to be a common bug in these scopes.

Both channels were connected to the calibrator output. The channels were set to
1x (default setup), but probes were 10x, so the square signal amplitude in the
files appears as 300 mV, not 3 V.

Captures 1 through 5 are using both channels using various time bases and
attenuator settings. Captures 6 and 7 use only a single channel.

Files were saved after a single trigger capture, so both .csv and .wfm
should have exactly the same data.

Most screenshots don't actually show the waveform, but the basic settings can
still be seen on them (as well as in the included .txt files). Not showing the
waveform in the screenshot .png seems to be a common bug in these scopes.
Copy link
Owner

@scottprahl scottprahl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are great. Thanks for the contribution (and the note that screenshots are unreliable on this model). I look forward to incorporating them into the baseline set of tests.

@scottprahl scottprahl merged commit bb9b8b3 into scottprahl:master May 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants