-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Collections item key doesn't start with 0 #112
Comments
This bug raises one question:
So, do we want to user to specify and find out
|
I think in the case of a normal ordering, we can use the current approach because it doesn't change anything. For the jobs/collections where we have not direct order of items/keys then a person should choose exactly the item number which to start from (not an amount of items to be skipped), because when a user puts something as a value to "start" it means he/she knows where exactly to start from, when to count amount of items before this item to start will be much more difficult task |
The current approach doesn't support |
So the idea is when somebody specifies |
* Rewrite Source and add StoreSource mocks * Separate start_index and start, support for collections, closes #112
start=0
is set as default for Cloud Items puller, however collections have custom indexes, 0 not necessary the first.Maybe the jobs too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: