-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
On grouping sites together #23
Milestone
Comments
This should apply to all datasets. For some of the LTS datasets I’ll have to decrease the minimum observations required when grouping. |
sdtaylor
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2017
lower minimum number observations, see #23
sdtaylor
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2017
This applies the same cleaning done on the NPN data to LTS data, specifically grouping sites into a single observation, and having a minimum number of observations at the end. * normilize site observation numbers I was grouping together multiple observations at NPN sites, and also applying a min. number of observations. This now does that at all the LTS datasets as well. * testing typo * change flr percent to 10 to match buds lower minimum number observations, see #23 * more descriptive name for this * change cutoffs to 10% to match harvard
without grouping sites together resultsTotal species/phenophase comparisons: 39
|
sdtaylor
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2018
This applies the same cleaning done on the NPN data to LTS data, specifically grouping sites into a single observation, and having a minimum number of observations at the end. * normilize site observation numbers I was grouping together multiple observations at NPN sites, and also applying a min. number of observations. This now does that at all the LTS datasets as well. * testing typo * change flr percent to 10 to match buds lower minimum number observations, see #23 * more descriptive name for this * change cutoffs to 10% to match harvard
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Crimmens et al does this with the NPN dataset. If multiple individuals are observed at a single site, they take the mean of their budburst/flowering, etc. DOY. I'm not sure if I want to copy it though, as it takes away affects of plasticity.
Solution: do both. More than likely overall results will be exactly the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: