ESLint 9, flat config migration #1537
Conversation
![renovate[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/2740?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 57c67df The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate-eslint-9.x
branch
5 times, most recently
from
f9c56b1
to
a873c0d
Compare
|
Wait for downstream to support: typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#8211 |
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate-eslint-9.x
branch
from
b9e81ce
to
b026cb9
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate-eslint-9.x
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8daf0c5
to
567c233
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate-eslint-9.x
branch
4 times, most recently
from
07fed65
to
bff669d
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate-eslint-9.x
branch
3 times, most recently
from
63c0c88
to
c64c909
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate-eslint-9.x
branch
6 times, most recently
from
3df0fe5
to
c294e56
Compare
Co-authored-by: Sam Chung <samc@seek.com.au>
src/cli/lint/internalLints/upgrade/patches/8.2.1/collapseDuplicateMergeKeys.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/cli/lint/internalLints/upgrade/patches/8.2.1/collapseDuplicateMergeKeys.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const replaceAllUntilStable = ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question: Could we use replaceAll instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately not. The regex replaces pairs into one; but for cases of three or more in a row, it needs multiple rounds to condense them. I'm open to better approaches, this was a tricky one because I didn't want to parse the file (and end up fully reformatting it when writing it back out), so everything I considered was piles of hacks (including this!)
src/cli/lint/internalLints/upgrade/patches/8.2.1/upgradeESLint.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/cli/lint/internalLints/upgrade/patches/8.2.1/upgradeESLint.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| 'tmp*/', | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| ...base.map(({ plugins: { jest: _jest, ...restPlugins } = {}, ...conf }) => ({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
question: why do we need to ignore the jest plugin from the base?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This could be cleaned up after with an eslint-config-seek change, eslint currently yells if you try to redefine a plugin that's already defined, but if you defined it in a block with files you can't use it unless it's exactly the same files 😬
| @@ -25,7 +25,13 @@ echo '--- pnpm build' | |||
| pnpm build | |||
|
|
|||
| echo '--- pnpm pack' | |||
| # I'm sure there's a better way to do this | |||
| eslint_config_skuba_tar="$(pwd)/packages/eslint-config-skuba/$(cd packages/eslint-config-skuba && pnpm pack | grep -o 'eslint-config-skuba-.*\.tgz')" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh gotcha because we're packing the thing but the eslint config dep is workspace:* it injects the workspace's current version into that so when we install it, it pulls latest. Damn
src/cli/lint/internalLints/upgrade/patches/8.2.1/collapseDuplicateMergeKeys.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Sam Chung <samc@seek.com.au>
|
Huge PR so if anyone has feedback after the fact happy to loop back! Will endeavour to do some internal snapshot testing and the like on master too. |
FlatESLint#1157