Continous Benchmark

[egecetin]

Automatically generate performance benchmark information for website using Google Benchmark

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.93%. Comparing base (a600a70) to head (d6e90c0).
Report is 4 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1392      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.94%   82.93%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         273      273              
  Lines       46353    46353              
  Branches     9642     9472     -170     
==========================================
- Hits        38446    38441       -5     
- Misses       7280     7311      +31     
+ Partials      627      601      -26     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fedora39	74.55% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
macos-12	80.89% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
macos-13	80.31% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
macos-14	80.22% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
mingw32	71.42% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
mingw64	71.42% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
npcap	84.88% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
rhel94	74.31% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
ubuntu2004	57.90% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
ubuntu2004-zstd	58.05% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
ubuntu2204	74.23% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
ubuntu2204-icpx	58.43% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
ubuntu2404	74.52% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittest	82.93% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
windows-2019	84.92% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
windows-2022	84.93% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
winpcap	84.90% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
xdp	49.29% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tigercosmos]

Where can I see the benchmark result?

[egecetin]

@tigercosmos Check "Run benchmark" step https://github.com/seladb/PcapPlusPlus/actions/runs/10644856460/job/29510043289

Approx. 10Gbps parsing, 1Gbps crafting performance in GitHub CI (just looking bytes per sec). Also items per sec is a good indicator which can we tabulate as for mean packet sizes (For example, if avg packet length 64, 512, 1024, 1500 etc -> size* items per sec *8

[tigercosmos]

Will it show a warning if the benchmark performance decreases too much? Otherwise, people will not click into the CI and check the result.

[egecetin]

@tigercosmos Actually my aim is to generate and update the benchmark results automatically. I enabled PR runs for just testing. I'll disable it when the work is done, and the runs will be only from master or dev. Because benchmark results can be very flaky without a dedicated machine/runner unfortunately. This workflow and integration with Google benchmark are just for easier benchmarking in local PCs and to give an idea about to performance in PcapPlusPlus website (since current benchmark really old)