You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should be tackled after the new alphabet #267 is included!
The quality alphabets are not understood easily. Should I use phred42 pr phred63? What's the difference? And which "Format" (regarding the Sanger/Illumina/Solexa encoding) is used?
Our documentation is not completely clear about this and should be improved.
Work yourself into what the phred alphabet is representing. First by reading our documentation, s.t. you have hands-on experience which parts are confusing.
Improve the documentation on the quality landing page s.t. it is clearer to users what quality alphabet they should use in which case. Kind of a guide to follow.
Also reference (\ref) the landing page documentation on the individual quality alphabets (phred42/63/68legacy) documentation, s.t. the user is pointed to the detailed documentation
[EDIT (irallia)] Add a tutorial Phred score part to the alphabet tutorial. Add a snippet which represents a dna phred score combination to show the context for phred scores.
[EDIT (irallia)] Give also an explanation about Phred+33 and Phred+64 (we use only Phred+33?)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Should be tackled after the new alphabet #267 is included!
The quality alphabets are not understood easily. Should I use
phred42
prphred63
? What's the difference? And which "Format" (regarding the Sanger/Illumina/Solexa encoding) is used?Our documentation is not completely clear about this and should be improved.
References:
Tasks
\ref
) the landing page documentation on the individual quality alphabets (phred42/63/68legacy
) documentation, s.t. the user is pointed to the detailed documentationThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: