Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] IBF decompression #3082

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 3, 2022
Merged

Conversation

eseiler
Copy link
Member

@eseiler eseiler commented Oct 26, 2022

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 26, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
seqan3 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 2, 2022 at 3:36PM (UTC)

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Oct 26, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 98.23% // Head: 98.22% // Decreases project coverage by -0.00% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (e3b0aca) compared to base (92164e6).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3082      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.23%   98.22%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         275      275              
  Lines       12197    12203       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        11982    11987       +5     
- Misses        215      216       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...n3/search/dream_index/interleaved_bloom_filter.hpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...de/seqan3/argument_parser/detail/version_check.hpp 92.96% <0.00%> (-0.79%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Oct 26, 2022
@eseiler eseiler requested review from a team, MitraDarja and remyschwab and removed request for a team and MitraDarja October 31, 2022 15:27
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting and removed lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting labels Nov 2, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@Irallia Irallia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGFM, thank you.

@Irallia Irallia requested review from a team and smehringer and removed request for a team November 2, 2022 14:53
@eseiler eseiler removed the request for review from remyschwab November 2, 2022 14:53
Comment on lines 246 to 247
* \attention This constructor can only be used to construct **uncompressed** Interleaved Bloom Filters.
*
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* \attention This constructor can only be used to construct **uncompressed** Interleaved Bloom Filters.
*
* \attention This constructor can only be used to construct **uncompressed** Interleaved Bloom Filters (IBFs).
* Construction of compressed from compressed IBFs is trivial and handled by different constructors.
*

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

or similar.

otherwise you might think it is not possible

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it's best to remove that \attention completely?

Co-authored-by: Svenja Mehringer <svenja.mehringer@gmail.com>
@seqan-actions seqan-actions added the lint [INTERNAL] signal for linting label Nov 2, 2022
@smehringer smehringer merged commit 62b3b7d into seqan:master Nov 3, 2022
@eseiler eseiler deleted the feature/ibf_ctor branch November 3, 2022 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants