Fix tests #5
Fix tests #5
Conversation
|
@elsteelbrain any idea why TravisCI is not running? |
|
why did you delete the "configure" function? The commit message "fix tests" does not really help... |
|
I should've been more explicit in the messages but we decided to remove the |
|
is that conversation public? I'm asking because I'm thinking if it is worth porting serverless/fdk#81 to event-gateway-sdk, but if you don't see value in such a functionality (as it is similar to configure), I won't do it. |
|
The decision was made in a private conversation. @mthenw what is your opinion on this? |
|
Hi @p0wl thanks for asking! In general, because of how Event Gateway works right now there is no way to provide atomic operation allowing configuring multiple functions/subscriptions. That's why in some cases that would cause an inconsistent state in the EG comparing to what user defined. That's why we decided to fix it in the EG in the first place and then add In general, the plan is allowing configuring whole space in one atomic operation in EG. Let me know if you have more questions. |
No description provided.