Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: Introduce schema validation for module property #641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2021
Merged

feat: Introduce schema validation for module property #641

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2021

Conversation

rileypriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@rileypriddle rileypriddle commented Nov 15, 2021 •
edited
Loading

defines the module property to remove the validation error in serverless 2.0+

ref: #575

@rileypriddle
extend config validation schema for functions
1f9ea39 
defines the module property to removed the validation error in serverless 2.0+
@pgrzesik pgrzesik mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2021
Closed
pgrzesik
pgrzesik approved these changes Nov 18, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@pgrzesik pgrzesik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greal call, thank you @rileypriddle 🙇

@pgrzesik pgrzesik changed the title extend config validation schema for functions feat: Introduce schema validation for module property Nov 18, 2021
@pgrzesik pgrzesik merged commit 36a469b into serverless:master Nov 18, 2021
@rileypriddle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @pgrzesik!

@rileypriddle rileypriddle deleted the patch-1 branch November 19, 2021 10:25
@rileypriddle rileypriddle mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pgrzesik pgrzesik pgrzesik approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rileypriddle @pgrzesik