We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{ "status": "FAIL", "group": "default", "message": "assert_true: responseEnd should be greater than 0 in cross-origin request. expected true got false", "stack": "test_greater_than/<@http://web-platform.test:8000/resource-timing/resources/webperftestharness.js:141:27\nTest.prototype.step@http://web-platform.test:8000/resources/testharness.js:1594:20\ntest@http://web-platform.test:8000/resources/testharness.js:544:21\nwp_test@http://web-platform.test:8000/resource-timing/resources/webperftestharness.js:57:5\ntest_greater_than@http://web-platform.test:8000/resource-timing/resources/webperftestharness.js:141:5\nonload_test@http://web-platform.test:8000/resource-timing/resource_TAO_zero.htm:42:5\n", "subtest": "responseEnd should be greater than 0 in cross-origin request.", "test": "/resource-timing/resource_TAO_zero.htm", "line": 52133, "action": "test_result", "expected": "PASS" }
We should revisit this test as part of fixing #21270.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should we remove this case in #23625 and use this one for intermittent reference of /resource-timing/resource_TAO_zero.htm ?
/resource-timing/resource_TAO_zero.htm
Sorry, something went wrong.
Oh, whoops, I missed that there were two different tests in the output for #23625. Yes, removing the unrelated test would be good.
Removed!
No branches or pull requests
We should revisit this test as part of fixing #21270.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: