Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create landing page for servo.org #8365

Closed
edunham opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 11 comments
Closed

Create landing page for servo.org #8365

edunham opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 11 comments
Labels
A-documentation B-interesting-project Represents work that is expected to be interesting in some fashion E-more-complex Variable effort required; may require a mentor. Recommended solution is clearly described in the iss I-enhancement No impact; the issue is a missing or proposed feature.

Comments

@edunham
Copy link
Contributor

edunham commented Nov 5, 2015

https://github.com/servo/servo.org should contain a web page rather than just a redirect. Requirements:

@edunham edunham added E-less-complex Straightforward. Recommended for a new contributor. I-enhancement No impact; the issue is a missing or proposed feature. E-more-complex Variable effort required; may require a mentor. Recommended solution is clearly described in the iss A-documentation labels Nov 5, 2015
@jdm jdm added B-interesting-project Represents work that is expected to be interesting in some fashion and removed E-less-complex Straightforward. Recommended for a new contributor. labels Nov 5, 2015
@nerith
Copy link
Contributor

nerith commented Nov 5, 2015

I'd like to work on this.

@edunham
Copy link
Contributor Author

edunham commented Nov 5, 2015

@nerith thank you! It's probably best to enable github pages on a personal fork of https://github.com/servo/servo.org to test changes, then make a PR once you're happy with the page.

@lucywyman
Copy link

Staging landing page at http://lucywyman.github.com/servo.org

PR: servo/servo.org#4

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

metajack commented Nov 6, 2015

Wow! Nice work!

@nerith
Copy link
Contributor

nerith commented Nov 6, 2015

My prototype of the landing page is at http://nerith.github.io/servo.org
The page is able to be rendered with Servo as well.

@edunham
Copy link
Contributor Author

edunham commented Nov 6, 2015

@lucywyman Has your prototype been tested in Servo?

@lucywyman
Copy link

@edunham Yeah -- I built the latest release version from github:

selection_007

I'm not certain how much of a problem the OS error is, but it does at least seem to be rendering...

Let me know if you need more information!

@edunham
Copy link
Contributor Author

edunham commented Nov 10, 2015

@nerith, @lucywyman Thank you both for the site prototypes! We just talked about them in the Servo meeting and the team's consensus is that we love the content completeness and GitHub, blog, and contributing icons of @lucywyman's prototype, yet feel that the visual style of @nerith's is more consistent with Rust's themes and portrays the more serious, researchy (as opposed to playful, start-up-like) tone that we'd prefer going forward.

In my opinion, the easiest way to combine the best of both prototypes will be to merge @nerith's PR, then ask @lucywyman to PR against the repo to update the site's content and icons. Does this sound good to both of you?

Thank you both again for the speedy, awesome work -- choosing between the two prototype sites has been a surprising and wonderful problem to have.

@lucywyman
Copy link

Sounds good :)

@nerith
Copy link
Contributor

nerith commented Nov 10, 2015

@edunham Sounds good.

@edunham
Copy link
Contributor Author

edunham commented Nov 10, 2015

Thank you both again for all the hard work!

@edunham edunham closed this as completed Nov 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-documentation B-interesting-project Represents work that is expected to be interesting in some fashion E-more-complex Variable effort required; may require a mentor. Recommended solution is clearly described in the iss I-enhancement No impact; the issue is a missing or proposed feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants