New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Position insertion point in input field with mouse #14291
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -304,6 +304,21 @@ impl<'a> TextRun { | |
}) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Returns the index in the range of the first glyph advancing over given advance | ||
pub fn range_index_of_advance(&self, range: &Range<ByteIndex>, advance: Au) -> usize { | ||
// TODO(Issue #199): alter advance direction for RTL | ||
// TODO(Issue #98): using inter-char and inter-word spacing settings when measuring text | ||
let mut remaining = advance; | ||
self.natural_word_slices_in_range(range) | ||
.map(|slice| { | ||
let (slice_index, slice_advance) = | ||
slice.glyphs.range_index_of_advance(&slice.range, remaining, self.extra_word_spacing); | ||
remaining -= slice_advance; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @pcwalton |
||
slice_index | ||
}) | ||
.sum() | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Returns an iterator that will iterate over all slices of glyphs that represent natural | ||
/// words in the given range. | ||
pub fn natural_word_slices_in_range(&'a self, range: &Range<ByteIndex>) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please document what the return values of this function are in a comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While describing what this function returns I realized that it's more intuitive if it returns
(index, current_advance)
instead of(index, advance -current_advance)
. This just needed a slight modification in the part that invokes this.I'll add some comments after I push the modifications.