New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rename checks to follow Checkstyle convention for check names #417

Closed

MEZk opened this issue Dec 28, 2015 · 1 comment

Milestone

Contributor

MEZk commented Dec 28, 2015

checkstyle/checkstyle#2780

Checkstyle name convension for checks names: XXXXCheck

The following classes should be renamed:
AvoidDefaultSerializableInInnerClasses
ForbidCCommentsInMethods
ReturnBooleanFromTernary
ReturnNullInsteadOfBoolean

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

MEZk changed the title ~~Rename checks to folllow Checkstyle convesion for check names~~ Rename checks to follow Checkstyle convesion for check names

MEZk changed the title ~~Rename checks to follow Checkstyle convesion for check names~~ Rename checks to follow Checkstyle convension for check names

MEZk changed the title ~~Rename checks to follow Checkstyle convension for check names~~ Rename checks to follow Checkstyle convention for check names

MEZk added a commit to MEZk/sevntu.checkstyle that referenced this issue


          Issue sevntu-checkstyle#417: Rename checks to follow Checkstyle conve…

4d181e9

…ntion for check names

MEZk added a commit to MEZk/sevntu.checkstyle that referenced this issue


          Issue sevntu-checkstyle#417: Rename checks to follow Checkstyle conve…

5aa7716

…ntion for check names

romani pushed a commit that referenced this issue


          Issue #417: Rename checks to follow Checkstyle convention for check n…

45e2731

…ames

Member

romani commented Jan 1, 2016

fix is merged.

romani closed this as completed

romani added this to the 1.18 milestone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment