Slight bug in fstab syntax definition?

[H4CKY54CK]

At the risk of doing everything completely incorrectly, I have replaced the bug report template with something more concise and helpful. I also did a quick search through these issues for "fstab" before making this bug report. Correction, I looked through open issues for fstab. I just checked the closed ones, and it looks like this was actually noticed in the initial addition of the syntax definition, but may have just flew under the radar by accident. #706 (comment)

In the syntax definition for fstab, it should also accept a 2 as a valid option for the 6th field. I only noticed because I was trying to use the syntax file in Sublime Text and saw the big red block indicating a syntax error. In the output of bat /etc/fstab, that 2 is just white, which looked correct. Here's a permalink to the line in question.

bat/assets/syntaxes/02_Extra/Fstab.sublime-syntax

Line 98 in 4583826

- match: '\s*[01]\s*'

EDIT: I also meant to link to that original mention.

[yuvalmo]

I would love to fix this issue. I noticed the same fix is needed for the fstab_pass field as well:

bat/assets/syntaxes/02_Extra/Fstab.sublime-syntax

Line 110 in 4583826

- match: '\s*[01]\s*'

I also edited the fstab regression test so it covers all the possible range of numbers for these fields, and made sure it works correctly.

You can review the fix here: #2250.

P.S. I'm pretty new to open-source, so I hope I didn't miss anything in the process. Please let me know if I did and I'll fix it.

[keith-hall]

Thanks for your contribution @yuvalmo, looks good to me! :)