Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bat requires glibc 2.18 - CentOS 7 only offers glibc 2.17 #46

Closed
jm-pro opened this issue May 3, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #47
Closed

Bat requires glibc 2.18 - CentOS 7 only offers glibc 2.17 #46

jm-pro opened this issue May 3, 2018 · 5 comments · Fixed by #47

Comments

@jm-pro
Copy link

jm-pro commented May 3, 2018

On CentOS 7.4.1708, when trying to run bat, there is a GLIBC version problem error

/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.18' not found (required by ./bat)

CentOS 7 only offers glibc 2.17

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented May 3, 2018

Fixed in v0.2.3.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link

I just ran into this too at work :-/

CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)
bat 0.6.1 from the releases page

Any idea?

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented Sep 4, 2018

@eddelbuettel Please use the statically linked version of bat that uses musl instead of libc (the *-musl* tarballs/deb-packages).

@eddelbuettel
Copy link

Ok. Could you pretty-please label the musl ones as statically-linked? I would have picked them.

When I came across musl (via tickets to my projects) it was mostly about surviving with a minimal libc, not static builds --> not obvious.

@sharkdp
Copy link
Owner

sharkdp commented Sep 4, 2018

Yes, good idea. Could you please open a new ticket, so we can track this? Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants