Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.30.7 #387

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 5.30.6 -> 5.30.7 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 5.30.6 -> 5.30.7 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v5.30.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-inferrable] fix optional param to valid code (#​5342) (98f6d5e)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unused-vars] highlight last write reference (#​5267) (c3f199a)
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v5.30.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 103485b to 3eb2494 Compare July 22, 2022 17:57
@vladholubiev vladholubiev merged commit 19af0c4 into master Jul 22, 2022
@vladholubiev vladholubiev deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch July 22, 2022 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant