fix: marko, mdx, vue

[LeoDog896]

This PR fixes broken links to marko, mdx, and vue. They changed their repository layouts, leading to broken links.

The changes to mdx specifically are very impactful, as the link has been broken for some time.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for shiki-matsu ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	23a3215
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/shiki-matsu/deploys/64230594ed8a5600081f3cb0
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-452--shiki-matsu.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[LeoDog896]

This supersedes #447 (brings it from the original mdx-analyzer source).

[wooorm]

I’d recommend the URL from #447, that’s where it is maintained. That’s where discussion happens. That’s where changes happen. mdx-analyzer will have a delay!

[LeoDog896]

Didn't see this comment in the mdx file. My main concern is that it may conflict the statement:

that looks exactly like your code in VS Code

if the release cycle of mdx-analyzer is different than your tm package. However, it sounds perfectly nice just as long as the authors agree.

(Essentially, your repository is on, afaik, the bleeding edge while mdx-analyzer is the stable version).

[wooorm]

I don’t know where you quote “that looks exactly like your code in VS Code” from?

[LeoDog896]

In the shiki README's about section, it mentions that little statement. Because of that, I'm not sure whether to follow mdx-analyzer's stable version or your version.

If the authors are fine with using your version (the actual source), then I'll drop the mdx fix in this PR and leave the maintainers to merge yours 👍

[wooorm]

Ah, ok. I can’t comment on what the good folks here prefer!

[orta]

Yeah, lets go with @wooorm's - if you'd like to change it in this PR that's fine, otherwise you can remove it and I'll also accept #447

[orta]

Thanks!

[octref]

VS Code's grammars are just a baseline. If there are better grammars I'm totally cool with merging them. Thanks @wooorm and @LeoDog896 !