Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LPS-129972 Simplify DSLQuery CustomSQL interactions #9917

Closed
wants to merge 799 commits into from

Conversation

Preston-Crary
Copy link

No description provided.

brianchandotcom and others added 30 commits March 31, 2021 04:55
@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

To conserve resources, the PR Tester does not automatically run for every pull.

If your code changes were already tested in another pull, reference that pull in this pull so the test results can be analyzed.

If your pull was never tested, comment "ci:test" to run the PR Tester for this pull.

@Preston-Crary
Copy link
Author

ci:test:relevant

@Preston-Crary
Copy link
Author

ci:test:sf

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 4 minutes

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 42d9112dbe2ba3e15d3b17d57485bcc3104d48ef

Sender Branch:

Branch Name: LPS-129972
Branch GIT ID: 5c43361730286e222f9ba062291231a102bb9887

1 out of 1jobs PASSED
1 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:stable - 9 out of 9 jobs passed

❌ ci:test:relevant - 23 out of 28 jobs passed in 5 hours 3 minutes

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 42d9112dbe2ba3e15d3b17d57485bcc3104d48ef

Upstream Comparison:

Branch GIT ID: 42d9112dbe2ba3e15d3b17d57485bcc3104d48ef
Jenkins Build URL: Acceptance Upstream DXP (master) #1712

ci:test:stable - 9 out of 9 jobs PASSED
9 Successful Jobs:
ci:test:relevant - 23 out of 28 jobs PASSED
23 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

Failures unique to this pull:


Failures in common with acceptance upstream results at 42d9112:

BiFunction<Expression<String>, String, Predicate> operatorBiFunction,
String[] values) {

if ((values != null) && (values.length == 0)) {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Preston-Crary do you mean if ((values == null) || (values.length == 0)) { here? Because by the current logic, if values is null, you will get a NPE at 40e9e66#diff-39eafb03fec7101df60be56569e519a5d70deac7b42d146d6bc636ee90917554R231

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I'll fix and resend. I think I copied that over from replaceKeywords() and didn't fully update it. Thanks!

@Preston-Crary
Copy link
Author

Please see #9920

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet