You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently its too complicated to invalidate partial caches in templates (you basically have to comment out the <% cache %> part. I've talked to Hamish a while ago, we think it'd be more intuitive to invalidate caches on ?flush=all as well (it roughly fits in the "clear template cache" thinking). This has to be limited to ADMIN access of course, to avoid denial of service attacks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, it seems this feature was accidentally added in d3b63da, and then accidentally removed by me in d012b79. Shouldn’t be too hard to implement, just need to flush the cache named “cacheblock”.
I appreciate this should be master, but would it be better to make this 3.1 instead? Given that the behaviour, although a bug, has existed throughout versions 3.0 - 3.1.5.
created by: @chillu (ischommer)
assigned to: hfried
created at: 2010-07-11
original ticket: http://open.silverstripe.org/ticket/5807
Currently its too complicated to invalidate partial caches in templates (you basically have to comment out the <% cache %> part. I've talked to Hamish a while ago, we think it'd be more intuitive to invalidate caches on ?flush=all as well (it roughly fits in the "clear template cache" thinking). This has to be limited to ADMIN access of course, to avoid denial of service attacks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: