MINOR: nice improvement to make can methods easier to access

[sunnysideup]

This is a small enhancements that you may or may not like to make it easier to access can Methods using the Member rather than the object.

[GuySartorelli]

I don't think either of the examples in the doc comment would work in a template... for that matter I don't think it would ever be possible to pass an object in, and to pass in a class you'd have to include the full namespaced classname as a string in the template wouldn't you? I feel like $Object.canView (or can whatever else) in a template would still be a lot easier to read and use than the new method, unless I'm missing some use case.

[kinglozzer]

I feel like $Object.canView (or can whatever else) in a template would still be a lot easier to read and use than the new method, unless I'm missing some use case.

Agreed, that approach also allows different can* methods that won’t be “whitelisted” in this method - e.g. canPublish etc are missing, but you can obviously add any permission checking method to the object. Thanks for the suggestion though @sunnysideup