Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bazel icon #8166

Closed
alexeagle opened this issue Dec 26, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10477
Closed

Bazel icon #8166

alexeagle opened this issue Dec 26, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10477
Assignees
Labels
new icon Issues or pull requests for adding a new icon

Comments

@alexeagle
Copy link

Brand Name

Bazel

Website

https://bazel.build

Popularity Metric

https://www.similarweb.com/website/bazel.build/#overview
Global Rank
#325,285

https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel
20k stars

Official Resources for Icon and Color

From https://blog.bazel.build/2017/07/05/new-logo-and-homepage.html

https://blog.bazel.build/images/bazel-icon.svg

Additional Comments

No response

Contributing

Yes

@alexeagle alexeagle added the new icon Issues or pull requests for adding a new icon label Dec 26, 2022
@alexeagle
Copy link
Author

Looks like it was abandoned in #5573

@dzintars
Copy link
Contributor

dzintars commented Feb 4, 2024

Bazel

  <img alt="Bazel" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/-Bazel-419B45?style=flat&logo=%2BPC9zdmc%2B" />

gRPC

<img alt="Bazel" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/-Bazel-419B45?style=flat&logo=" />

For anyone looking into this - It all stopped at SI variants discussion because "I have no authority to decide which variant should be pushed", so I went "one level deeper" to research "other options". Not sure how far SI went with this idea.

If there would be a consensus about the outlined or filled variant, then the above SVG's is what I ended up with at that point in time.

My personal vote goes for filled variant. Only gaps should be increased by a little bit.

@PeterShaggyNoble
Copy link
Member

As we've yet to resolve the issues surrounding allowing variants and their implementation, I think we should proceed with adding one of these regardless. My vote would also go to the filled version as, to me, it's more faithful to the original, using our standard 0.5dp cut-outs. Would you like to submit a PR for that, @dzintars?

dzintars added a commit to dzintars/simple-icons that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2024
Due to challenges within monochromatic icon requirements I added gaps/cutouts between the elements.
Size of the gap was "eyeballed" so that it looks kind of fine for small 16px icons on non-retina screens.
(10px gap on 512px scale icon)
I didn't found any styleguide, so color was picked from there https://blog.bazel.build/2017/07/05/new-logo-and-homepage.html
Outlined version was discarded as it looks terrible on a small icons an overall community favored filled version.
Keeping mathematically correct element sizes and corner positions are kind of challenging
but current solution is close enough.
I even went so far that I modeled icon in 3D software to get accurate projection, but... original icon does not count in real isometry.
So I discarded true 3D version of SVG as well.

closes: simple-icons#8166
dzintars added a commit to dzintars/simple-icons that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2024
Due to challenges within monochromatic icon requirements I added gaps/cutouts between the elements.
Size of the gap was "eyeballed" so that it looks kind of fine for small 16px icons on non-retina screens.
(10px gap on 512px scale icon)
I didn't found any styleguide, so color was picked from there https://blog.bazel.build/2017/07/05/new-logo-and-homepage.html
Outlined version was discarded as it looks terrible on a small icons an overall community favored filled version.
Keeping mathematically correct element sizes and corner positions are kind of challenging
but current solution is close enough.
I even went so far that I modeled icon in 3D software to get accurate projection, but... original icon does not count in real isometry.
So I discarded true 3D version of SVG as well.

closes: simple-icons#8166
@dzintars dzintars mentioned this issue Feb 16, 2024
3 tasks
dzintars added a commit to dzintars/simple-icons that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
Due to challenges within monochromatic icon requirements I added gaps/cutouts between the elements.
Size of the gap was "eyeballed" so that it looks kind of fine for small 16px icons on non-retina screens.
(10px gap on 512px scale icon)
I didn't found any styleguide, so color was picked from there https://blog.bazel.build/2017/07/05/new-logo-and-homepage.html
Outlined version was discarded as it looks terrible on a small icons an overall community favored filled version.
Keeping mathematically correct element sizes and corner positions are kind of challenging
but current solution is close enough.
I even went so far that I modeled icon in 3D software to get accurate projection, but... original icon does not count in real isometry.
So I discarded true 3D version of SVG as well.

closes: simple-icons#8166
dzintars added a commit to dzintars/simple-icons that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
Due to challenges within monochromatic icon requirements I added gaps/cutouts between the elements.
Size of the gap was "eyeballed" so that it looks kind of fine for small 16px icons on non-retina screens.
(10px gap on 512px scale icon)
I didn't found any styleguide, so color was picked from there https://blog.bazel.build/2017/07/05/new-logo-and-homepage.html
Outlined version was discarded as it looks terrible on a small icons an overall community favored filled version.
Keeping mathematically correct element sizes and corner positions are kind of challenging
but current solution is close enough.
I even went so far that I modeled icon in 3D software to get accurate projection, but... original icon does not count in real isometry.
So I discarded true 3D version of SVG as well.

closes: simple-icons#8166
dzintars added a commit to dzintars/simple-icons that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
Due to challenges within monochromatic icon requirements I added gaps/cutouts between the elements.
Size of the gap was "eyeballed" so that it looks kind of fine for small 16px icons on non-retina screens.
(10px gap on 512px scale icon)
I didn't found any styleguide, so color was picked from there https://blog.bazel.build/2017/07/05/new-logo-and-homepage.html
Outlined version was discarded as it looks terrible on a small icons an overall community favored filled version.
Keeping mathematically correct element sizes and corner positions are kind of challenging
but current solution is close enough.
I even went so far that I modeled icon in 3D software to get accurate projection, but... original icon does not count in real isometry.
So I discarded true 3D version of SVG as well.

closes: simple-icons#8166
dzintars added a commit to dzintars/simple-icons that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2024
Due to challenges within monochromatic icon requirements I added gaps/cutouts between the elements.
Size of the gap was "eyeballed" so that it looks kind of fine for small 16px icons on non-retina screens.
(10px gap on 512px scale icon)
I didn't found any styleguide, so color was picked from there https://blog.bazel.build/2017/07/05/new-logo-and-homepage.html
Outlined version was discarded as it looks terrible on a small icons an overall community favored filled version.
Keeping mathematically correct element sizes and corner positions are kind of challenging
but current solution is close enough.
I even went so far that I modeled icon in 3D software to get accurate projection, but... original icon does not count in real isometry.
So I discarded true 3D version of SVG as well.

closes: simple-icons#8166
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new icon Issues or pull requests for adding a new icon
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants