Add note regarding using cmd and name properties

[stroncium]

#30 provided the code, this just adds a hint to readme about that.

I think it's the maximum we can do about #1 without drastically changing API as it is a bit more complicated than just "process name" on Linux and OS X. There are command line, executable name, process name all different things that can change separately to some extent. Depending on how much the user knows about that and what are his purposes he might want to see each one of them as name. However as ps-list is mostly designed for relatively simple use cases, I think providing original name as it is and hinting that one might extract something that is most similar to windows name from cmd is the way as it both gives the user simple enough solution to the problem and doesn't restrict him nor introduce incorrect abstractions.

Furthermore, it seems to be the limit of what we can do without introducing really complex dependencies. /proc is easy but only works under linux, ps implementations are different on different systems plus I didn't see a single one which provides more info than we already have.

---

IssueHunt Summary

Referenced issues

This pull request has been submitted to:

• #1: Full process name

---