Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(ReadonlyDeep): skip constructor #728

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 24, 2023
Merged

fix(ReadonlyDeep): skip constructor #728

merged 1 commit into from Oct 24, 2023

Conversation

Emiyaaaaa
Copy link
Collaborator

@sindresorhus sindresorhus merged commit 3ee234a into sindresorhus:main Oct 24, 2023
6 checks passed
@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

Can you check if we need to do the same to any of the other "deep" types?

@Emiyaaaaa Emiyaaaaa mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

A Constructor within a ReadonlyDeep type is not callable
2 participants
@Emiyaaaaa @sindresorhus