Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New branch (journal-week-2) and journal outline #6

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 26, 2015
Merged

Conversation

sjoyal
Copy link
Owner

@sjoyal sjoyal commented May 18, 2015

@gatorpazz and @MStaehling can you review this badboy???

@gatorpazz
Copy link

Your syntax and prose are to die for. Good use of the word shit, 10/10 would read again 👍

@MStaehling
Copy link

Solid outline 👍

* Keep reading and learning core concepts
* Don't bulldog the bad shit
* Journal entries aren't terrible, they just lag a week
* Beer is a hell of a drug

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm Rick James Bitch!

@JessyRiordan
Copy link

👍 Hilarious! I think this sums up exactly what we are all thinking!

@gatorpazz
Copy link

Coffee and tea are trade offs, it's an either or waste excretion. The sentiments are shared with the difficulty spike of week 2 and week 3 doesn't look like it'll be any better. 10/10, would read again 👍


##### What the effffff just happened?

Emphasis on the **F**. I just read my entry for week 1. It sounds remarkably upbeat and almost giddy with excitement. Who wrote that? All the things I was so positive about got rocked in the worst possible way during week 2. Git and github? el.oh.el. Practically everything I thought I was grasping turned out to be a lie. How was I supposed to know what a merge conflicts was? The fearless leader threw us into that fire firsthand. Learn by doing, he says. At least that means I followed directions properly since I avoided the problem until the intended face smack on Tuesday. And the JavaScript? Learning the fundamentals was borderline fun in week one. Applying those fundamentals to elements in the DOM? Not so much. I still have the command line to grasp onto. That didn't take an unexpected turn this week. Still, kind of sad. At least we have in class homework review. Where we all get to see how we're equally _dum_.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Six lines down, I believe it should be conflict.

Overall, awesome read, kind of depressing, but in a funny way.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the end of your first paragraph it's *dumb

@jorgehjr84
Copy link

I thought I was the only one wondering how we stacked up to other cohorts. I always think, "are we behind." I read your first draft and definitely like the additions you made. 💯 points. Although points don't matter.

@gatorpazz
Copy link

Not getting sarcasm aside good second week, onto the third! 👍

@pope410211
Copy link

I enjoyed your journal! I also wonder how we compare to past cohorts and enjoyed your use of emojis! 👍

@BFGriffith
Copy link

Nice summary of the emotional roller-coaster of week two! 👍 😱

sjoyal added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2015
New branch (journal-week-2) and journal outline
@sjoyal sjoyal merged commit 3354aa2 into master May 26, 2015
@sjoyal sjoyal deleted the journal-week-2 branch May 26, 2015 19:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants