chore: replace chalk with colorette

[bryanjtc]

Colorette is faster and smaller than chalk. With this change there will be a performance gain.

[skovy]

I'm curious if this will have a material impact on the performance of this tool? The log level can be turned down / off so very few logs are printed meaning this would result in almost no performance benefit since it's not used?

From a cost/benefit perspective, I see the cost of this introducing potential bugs/edge cases that don't exist today because this is all new code. Whereas the benefit is minimal (or zero if no logs)?

I'd rather leave the code that is working fine as it is unless we have data to prove otherwise. chalk is also more widely used and maintained.

[bryanjtc]

That's reasonable. I will look into measuring the performance of the tool. There should be a way to see if the tool is faster when a change is made.

[RoystonS]

It's also worth looking at the relative sustainability, number of contributors, etc for the packages.
e.g. https://snyk.io/advisor/npm-package/chalk and https://snyk.io/advisor/npm-package/colorette

[skovy]

Yes, thank you @RoystonS - for the listed reasons above and general health rating I believe it makes sense to stick with the current package due to its benefits and no known downsides in practice.