Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR - issue766 - Fixed the ignore warnings for example 04_fuzzy_joining #807

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dcor01
Copy link
Contributor

@dcor01 dcor01 commented Oct 26, 2023

Working towards issue #766

I have removed the warning thrown everytime fuzzy_join() is called. I have also got rid of the warnings.filterwarnings("ignore") in example 4.

I have also changed a few of the titles and capitalisation in example 4 that I noticed. Happy to remove them and resubmit the pull request if you guys don't like them.

Let me know your thoughts - this is my first PR. Thanks guys

Copy link
Member

@jeromedockes jeromedockes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks a lot!

@@ -253,8 +248,8 @@
y="Happiness score",
lowess=True,
)
fig.set_ylabel("Happiness index")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the fix! the figure title changes don't seem related to filtering warnings, right?
I think the old title might easier to understand for some readers, because "effect" could be understood to imply that life expectancy has a causal effect on happiness

fig.set_ylabel("Happiness index")
fig.set_title("Does a country's legal rights strength lead to happiness?")
fig.set_ylabel("Happiness Index")
fig.set_title("Effect of a Country's Strength of Legal Rights on Happiness")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we're changing the title I rather like the "is x linked to y" formulation above because it is more clear that we are only talking about correlations

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah fair enough. I will delete the wording changes. I just thought a question as a graph title looked a bit strange but happy to just leave them as is.

@dcor01
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcor01 commented Oct 28, 2023

I will close this PR. Instead using #808 without the wording changes

@dcor01 dcor01 closed this Oct 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants