-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Docs are not being built during CI check #4097
Comments
Hm, this seems to be a GitHub GUI issue? Because if you check directly on |
I agree. The builts are there when we see through the provided link but GH doesn't show it. I doubt this is a |
Yes, have also been looking into this as its blocking a PR from one of the new contributors I am working with. Curiously, if you look at checks that have run from the PR itself you see 18 (this number includes the ReadTheDocs build). But if you actually click on the detailed test summary the ReadTheDocs build disappears from the count and isn't included in the overall test run graph. Now, perhaps this isn't surprising because the read the docs test (from what I can tell) isn't actually included in the test.yml file where we put together all the other tests (and I assume is just linked in from some other Github actions widget or add on? I am not totally sure how it works right now). One potential solution that we could try out could be to explicitly use the Github action for Read The Docs? Just wondering if something might be up with how its currently running and it might be nice to have it run through the same interface as everything else? |
I've temporarily removed the requirement for the readthedocs check to pass, so merges become possible again (if everything else runs). |
Hm, readthedocs integration of CI checks is back, just shortly after recovery of the readthedocs One conjecture could be that the hijack of the Now that readthedocs account and the |
Describe the bug
I believe that all of the current PRs only show "Expected — Waiting for status to be reported" for
docs/readthedocs.org:sktime
check. I don't know what is causing this but it must be recent since I remember this check passing few days ago.To Reproduce
Expected behavior
Additional context
See #4093, #4075, #4087 etc.
Versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: