-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drafting governance document #324
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added some comments, for discussion.
Major thing to discuss is perhaps the "algorithm curation" issue.
GOVERNANCE.md
Outdated
|
||
sktime is a meritocratic, consensus-based community project. Anyone with an interest in the project can join the community, contribute to the project, and participate in the governance process. This document describes how that participation takes place and how to set about earning merit within our community. | ||
|
||
We are particularly motivated to support new and/or anxious collaborators, people who are looking to learn and develop their skills, and anyone who has experienced discrimination in the past. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
while strictly speaking correct, the reference to discrimination is a bit unusual, since it reference negative experiences - so it carries a strange sub-vibe that we like community members to have had past negative experiences. Maybe "diversity" type phrasing is less awkward here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's the same in the CoC, but happy to replace it with other formulations, any ideas?
GOVERNANCE.md
Outdated
|
||
### Algorithm maintainer | ||
|
||
Algorithm maintainers are contributors who have contributed an algorithm. They have the same voting rights as core developers with regard to their algorithm. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we define algorithm? This could also be an interface to an external package, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if that's necessary, they're intended to be guidelines, not rules.
Thanks for the review @fkiraly! Pushed new changes in line with your comments. |
Reviewed and agreed in community-council meeting: https://github.com/sktime/community-council/blob/master/previous_meetings/20200817-meeting.md |
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Outlines and formalises how we want to run our community, including rights/responsibilities of contributors and decision making processes in case of deadlocks.
Governance for a unified time series analysis framework
To dos
alan-turing-institute/sktime
and add to teams in sktime GitHub groupResources
Comments
This is a first draft. Anyone is welcome to comment on it or propose changes.