Check for additionalProperties to be set to false

[shapirone]

Summary

The backend defaults additionalProperties on parameters of the object type to true, so this PR inverts the check to see if they are explicitly setting additionalProperties to false.

Testing

1. Create an object parameter as a function input or output
2. Verify that at both workflow authoring time and at runtime, you're able to access unexpected properties.
3. Change the object parameters you created to set additionalProperties: false
4. Notice that your access of unexpected properties now results in errors.

anObject: {
        type: Schema.types.object,
        properties: {
            test: { type: Schema.types.string },
        },
        additionalProperties: false,
      },

Requirements (place an x in each [ ])

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.

[shapirone]

There was an issue here where we weren't closing the comment, which meant that name wasn't part of the BlockActionsBody defined payload. This is unrelated to the core of this PR and can be removed if we want.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #87 (855ef1a) into main (fc7d614) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #87   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.10%   96.10%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines        1565     1565           
  Branches       87       87           
=======================================
  Hits         1504     1504           
  Misses         59       59           
  Partials        2        2           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/parameters/mod.ts	93.42% <ø> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[shapirone]

I'm not sure there's a better way to do this type of test, but if this directive becomes unused (i.e. no error), it will let us know!

[selfcontained]

TIL

[shapirone]

We could probably figure out some way to avoid this duplication, but I didn't want to spend too much time on this. Open to suggestions.

[selfcontained]

beautiful, works as described.

[selfcontained]

TIL