Add additional object types to Web API JSON serializer #340
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ed as JSON, in addition to lists and dicts. Add tests to cover new cases.
Roach
changed the title
|
This project no longer supports version 1.x as we've described here. Allow me to close this now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Allow iterable type request parameters to be serialized as JSON, in addition to lists and dicts. Add tests to cover new cases. Tuples, sets and generators will now also be serialized. This fixes issue #337 .
If that's too wide a net to cast, I can narrow that down. Just let me know. :-)
Requirements (place an
xin each[ ])