Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/pn 27 reliable receiving in gcm #104

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Jun 27, 2016

Conversation

bogh
Copy link
Collaborator

@bogh bogh commented Jun 14, 2016

No description provided.


gcmMessage := gcm.NewMessage(payload, gcmID)
logger.WithFields(log.Fields{
"gcm_id": gcmID,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use CamelCase in logs

@marian-craciunescu
Copy link
Collaborator

server/message_for_route_test.go:10: undefined: MessageForRoute

This is causing your build to fail

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 80.126% when pulling dd81314 on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into cd855e2 on master.

bufferSize = 1000
)

var logger = log.WithField("module", "gcm")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

var logger = log.WithFields(log.Fields{
"app": "guble",
"module": "gcm",
"env": "TBD",
})

this is the common usage

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 80.189% when pulling 90e4f25 on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into cd855e2 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 81.167% when pulling 50dc4a7 on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into d1e5e3d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 81.167% when pulling 50dc4a7 on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into d1e5e3d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.9%) to 80.841% when pulling f1ffb31 on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into d1e5e3d on master.

sender: sendMessageSample,
}
params.throughputSend()
fmt.Println(params)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why yse fmt.Println and not log ?

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.7%) to 81.006% when pulling 77792f4 on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into d1e5e3d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.7%) to 81.006% when pulling a09dfff on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into d1e5e3d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.8%) to 79.348% when pulling 849f6d2 on feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm into c71c62e on master.

@bogh bogh merged commit 6070e34 into master Jun 27, 2016
@bogh bogh deleted the feature/pn-27-reliable-receiving-in-gcm branch June 27, 2016 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants