Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LDAP authentication #48

Closed
peelman opened this issue Nov 26, 2013 · 25 comments
Closed

LDAP authentication #48

peelman opened this issue Nov 26, 2013 · 25 comments
Milestone

Comments

@peelman
Copy link

peelman commented Nov 26, 2013

Let somebody else handle password hashing and storage.

Might not be feasible with Sentry, I'm not familiar enough with it to know how flexible it is. Rudimentary research shows others have forked it to add support for LDAP with mixed results.

phpipam uses adLDAP with great success (was the easiest AD integration I have ever experienced with a php app).

Awesome work so far! Let me dig in a little deeper and I hope to contribute and not just gripe about complicated stuff!

This might be another option.

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Nov 26, 2013

Definitely a good one on for the list! I absolutely want/NEED this as well.

@peelman
Copy link
Author

peelman commented Nov 27, 2013

so apparently adldap is already a composer package. i just spent about 30 minutes on it via ldap-auth, but didn't get anywhere substantial. Still not familiar enough with lavarel, sentry, etc., to really have an affect here...

@abrahamvegh
Copy link

+1

@technogenus
Copy link

Our team will definitely be working on LDAP integration which will mean getting rid of Sentry. We will likely need to move away from Sentry anyway due to the corp. branding of this package to "Sentinel" and we also discovered LOTS of bugs in the internal call/returns which makes some of elements of the current version unfixable unless we rewrite portions of Sentry (i.e. the Unhandled Exception when you try to view deleted users).

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Aug 7, 2014

I'm not sure that I agree with this path, but am open to discussion. We can talk more when I get back from Vegas on Tuesday tho.

@snipe snipe added the 👩‍💻 ready for dev These issues are ready for someone to work on them - take your pick! label Nov 5, 2014
@mnonnenmacher
Copy link

👍

I have found a fork of sentry that adds LDAP support, maybe it's worth a look when you are working on LDAP integration: https://github.com/anndro/SentryLdap

Do you have any plans on when you will implement this feature? I'm really looking forward to it :)

@chadleeshaw
Copy link

Is LDAP Authentication now possible, I just see the label ready? I'd like to be able to use LDAP Authentication to login and assign users from LDAP to assets. If this is possible how do I implement?

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Dec 16, 2014

It is not implemented yet.

@chadleeshaw
Copy link

Any rough idea on a date to be implemented :)

@rp-tech
Copy link

rp-tech commented Jan 22, 2015

+1 for LDAP can't wait for this feature!

@Deathomen
Copy link

Can we get an ETA on when this should be included? I'm very anxious for this.

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Feb 9, 2015

I don't currently have an LDAP setup to be able to work on this. If anyone else does I'll gladly accept pull requests on it.

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Feb 13, 2015

Test server here may work for anyone looking to work on this feature: http://www.forumsys.com/tutorials/integration-how-to/ldap/online-ldap-test-server/

@vabue
Copy link

vabue commented Feb 21, 2015

Looking for this feature too.

@TheLilleorg
Copy link

Would love to see this feature rolled out.

Tested it with sentry but found the configurations too unfamiliar to my liking.
Found another plugin to try : http://packalyst.com/packages/package/wells/l4-ldap-ntlm

The setup was rather easy considering.

My issue was I could see that snipe-IT was communicating with the server (had to remove the @ from the vendor package to work with my openldap setup) user was able to bind to the ldap server.

Couldn't get further.

@rp-tech
Copy link

rp-tech commented Mar 3, 2015

Call me crazy but have you guys ever considered partnering this with another FOSS project - check out OsTicket; I absolutely love their software and I am planning to use it alongside Snipe - if these 2 projects somehow worked together to create an integrated ticketing and asset management system, it would absolutely destroy the competition in many ways!

The reason I am bringing this up is because they have quite a mature development team over there, and their LDAP integration is already implemented and working well - perhaps they would be willing to share some of that information with another great FOSS team and help bring the cost of IT within reach for small providers!

@ippup
Copy link

ippup commented Apr 27, 2015

Any word on when we can expect an LDAP integration option?

This is the only thing stopping me from deploying snipeit

Aside from this single requirement, I believe its the best asset management software for SME on the market.

@brusch
Copy link

brusch commented Jul 1, 2015

  • 1

@hughevans
Copy link

I notice both this and SAML are tagged for v3.0. I would contest that only SAML is required. Everyone is seemingly moving in that direction and it isn’t hard to set up an IdP that works with AD such as ADFS.

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Jul 17, 2015

@hughevans - agreed

@snipe snipe closed this as completed Jul 17, 2015
@snipe snipe removed the 👩‍💻 ready for dev These issues are ready for someone to work on them - take your pick! label Jul 17, 2015
@misilot
Copy link
Contributor

misilot commented Jul 17, 2015

What about people that don't have AD, and just have LDAP?

@hughevans
Copy link

You could try SimpleSAMLphp.

@bunzladi bunzladi mentioned this issue Mar 10, 2022
2 tasks
@Bjufen Bjufen mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2023
2 tasks
This was referenced Aug 22, 2023
@manhvt20 manhvt20 mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2024
2 tasks
@uglycrab uglycrab mentioned this issue Mar 27, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests