Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enrich-kafka: add blob storage support #830

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

spenes
Copy link
Contributor

@spenes spenes commented Nov 16, 2023

Main aim of this PR is adding Azure Blob Storage client to enrich-kafka. Since enrich-kafka is cloud agnostic, I've added support for GCS and S3 as well. Also, I've integrated Azure Blob Storage client to enrich-nsq.

While doing these changes, I've made a bit refactoring. Firstly, I've moved blob storage clients to their own module. Secondly, I've moved config tests to their own modules. With this way, tests pick up modules' application.conf files.

Copy link
Contributor

@istreeter istreeter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would be OK to approve this. I'm just trying to probe if we can remove any complexity by doing it slightly differently.

@spenes spenes force-pushed the feature/azure-blob-storage-integration branch from 389b784 to 7e0554f Compare November 17, 2023 11:06
@spenes spenes changed the title Implement Azure Blob Storage Client enrich-kafka: add blob storage support Nov 17, 2023
@spenes spenes force-pushed the feature/azure-blob-storage-integration branch 2 times, most recently from 9e2cd33 to b18e2a7 Compare November 17, 2023 14:49
@spenes spenes force-pushed the feature/azure-blob-storage-integration branch from b18e2a7 to ccdc185 Compare November 20, 2023 10:03
@spenes spenes merged commit ccdc185 into develop Nov 20, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants