Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify CCI transaction output #69

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

quiteliderally
Copy link
Contributor

  • Rename the "provisioning" column to "active_transaction"
    It's slightly more accurate, and it's just a preference of mine not to
    introduce new terminology. If users interact with the API in other ways,
    it'll be called a transaction, right? Or is the terminology changing
    globally?
  • Display "" for an empty active transaction
    The empty string means that transaction would always have to be the last
    column, because you couldn't count on awk column offsets in selecting
    individual fields. Also, it makes it hard to grep for CCI that don't
    currently have an active transaction.

* Rename the "provisioning" column to "active_transaction"
It's slightly more accurate, and it's just a preference of mine not to
introduce new terminology. If users interact with the API in other ways,
it'll be called a transaction, right? Or is the terminology changing
globally?

* Display "<None>" for an empty active transaction
The empty string means that transaction would always have to be the last
column, because you couldn't count on awk column offsets in selecting
individual fields. Also, it makes it hard to grep for CCI that _don't_
currently have an active transaction.
@CrackerJackMack
Copy link
Contributor

Manually resolved and pushed. Closing merge request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants