-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PoC evaluation table #180
PoC evaluation table #180
Conversation
From today's conversation it is clear that neither WAC as it is now, nor ACP as it is now can cover this use case. But WAC+ does have an answer proposed in solid#176
There needs to be a place to point to answers for each use cases in each system when they exist. |
We can add second table which instead of requirements has specific use cases. We would already have quite a few links to https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/blob/master/proposals/acp/use-cases.md |
Yes, we may need both. I found that answering use cases directly is actually often very difficult as they often cover so many different requirements. |
This allows clients to find out what credentials to present.
good idea. Co-authored-by: Matthieu Bosquet <matthieubosquet@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
I think this one is ready to merge and we can start iterating via new PRs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for filling out the rest @elf-pavlik !
No description provided.