Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PoC evaluation table #180

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 21, 2021
Merged

PoC evaluation table #180

merged 10 commits into from
Mar 21, 2021

Conversation

elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

From today's conversation it is clear that neither WAC as it is now, nor ACP as it is now can cover this use case. 
But WAC+ does have an answer proposed in solid#176
@bblfish
Copy link
Member

bblfish commented Feb 24, 2021

There needs to be a place to point to answers for each use cases in each system when they exist.

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member Author

We can add second table which instead of requirements has specific use cases. We would already have quite a few links to https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/blob/master/proposals/acp/use-cases.md

@bblfish
Copy link
Member

bblfish commented Feb 24, 2021

Yes, we may need both. I found that answering use cases directly is actually often very difficult as they often cover so many different requirements.

This allows clients to find out what credentials to present.
good idea.

Co-authored-by: Matthieu Bosquet <matthieubosquet@gmail.com>
matthieubosquet and others added 2 commits March 17, 2021 14:22
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member Author

I think this one is ready to merge and we can start iterating via new PRs

Copy link
Member

@justinwb justinwb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for filling out the rest @elf-pavlik !

@justinwb justinwb merged commit 5c4ebfa into solid:master Mar 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants