New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove libyaml-devel pkg dependency for red hat family platforms. #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 22, 2013

Conversation

Projects
None yet
9 participants
@fnichol
Collaborator

fnichol commented Jan 7, 2013

ruby-build builds its own libyaml for all Ruby versions 1.9 and up.

Just running tests to verify there aren't regressions in Ruby 1.8.7.

Remove libyaml-devel pkg dependency for red hat family platforms.
ruby-build builds its own libyaml for all Ruby versions 1.9 and up.
@ChrisLundquist

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ChrisLundquist

ChrisLundquist Jan 11, 2013

+1 @jyotty was just talking about this

ChrisLundquist commented Jan 11, 2013

+1 @jyotty was just talking about this

@johnbellone

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@johnbellone

johnbellone Mar 28, 2013

+1 Ran into this problem building some recipes. Please merge!

johnbellone commented Mar 28, 2013

+1 Ran into this problem building some recipes. Please merge!

@adammck

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@adammck

adammck Apr 26, 2013

Contributor

👍

Contributor

adammck commented Apr 26, 2013

👍

@a2ikm

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@a2ikm

a2ikm commented May 10, 2013

👍

@johnbellone

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@johnbellone

johnbellone commented May 10, 2013

@jtslear

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jtslear

jtslear May 11, 2013

👍 @fnichol; using centos 6.4

jtslear commented May 11, 2013

👍 @fnichol; using centos 6.4

@poppen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@poppen

poppen commented May 11, 2013

👍

@rurounijones

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rurounijones

rurounijones May 21, 2013

Definitely a requirement for running on CentOS / RedHat. Until this is merged in this cookbook cannot be classed as support RHEL family of OSes.

If you do not want to rely on ruby-build for this then you need to add the EPEL repository which is a whole new kettle of fish.

+1 for getting this merged in pronto. The fact that it has been sitting here for 4 months suggests that @fnichol does not have time to maintain this repository. If that is the case I am sure there are people who would be willing to help out (me for one) if we can get the permissions.

rurounijones commented May 21, 2013

Definitely a requirement for running on CentOS / RedHat. Until this is merged in this cookbook cannot be classed as support RHEL family of OSes.

If you do not want to rely on ruby-build for this then you need to add the EPEL repository which is a whole new kettle of fish.

+1 for getting this merged in pronto. The fact that it has been sitting here for 4 months suggests that @fnichol does not have time to maintain this repository. If that is the case I am sure there are people who would be willing to help out (me for one) if we can get the permissions.

fnichol added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2013

Merge pull request #8 from fnichol/no-rhel-libyaml
Remove libyaml-devel pkg dependency for red hat family platforms.

@fnichol fnichol merged commit 381d68c into master May 22, 2013

@fnichol

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fnichol

fnichol May 22, 2013

Collaborator

Thank you everyone for the confirmation, very sorry for the delayed action.

Collaborator

fnichol commented May 22, 2013

Thank you everyone for the confirmation, very sorry for the delayed action.

fnichol added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2013

@fnichol fnichol deleted the no-rhel-libyaml branch May 23, 2013

@pwyoung

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pwyoung

pwyoung Dec 17, 2013

The dependency would have to be removed from "providers / ruby.rb" as well, right? This does work for me if I include EPEL (so that the package is found), but fails if I don't include EPEL. If a decision was made to just depend on EPEL, then I'm sorry if I missed that thread. Anyway, just a friendly notice, in case this is a (minor) issue anyone cares about.

pwyoung commented Dec 17, 2013

The dependency would have to be removed from "providers / ruby.rb" as well, right? This does work for me if I include EPEL (so that the package is found), but fails if I don't include EPEL. If a decision was made to just depend on EPEL, then I'm sorry if I missed that thread. Anyway, just a friendly notice, in case this is a (minor) issue anyone cares about.

@lock

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lock

lock bot Jul 24, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

lock bot commented Jul 24, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2018

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.