Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JP-3625: Switch to IRAF starfinder default #8487

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 18, 2024

Conversation

drlaw1558
Copy link
Collaborator

@drlaw1558 drlaw1558 commented May 15, 2024

Resolves JP-3625 by switching the code default starfinder for use in tweakreg to IRAF starfinder instead of DAO starfinder.

Checklist for PR authors (skip items if you don't have permissions or they are not applicable)

  • added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
  • updated or added relevant tests
  • updated relevant documentation
  • added relevant milestone
  • added relevant label(s)
  • ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
    How to run regression tests on a PR
  • All comments are resolved
  • Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly

@drlaw1558 drlaw1558 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 16:26
@drlaw1558 drlaw1558 changed the title Switch to IRAF starfinder default JP-3625: Switch to IRAF starfinder default May 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.00%. Comparing base (781e0e0) to head (2073da0).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8487      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   57.93%   58.00%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         387      387              
  Lines       38839    38811      -28     
==========================================
+ Hits        22502    22512      +10     
+ Misses      16337    16299      -38     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@emolter emolter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good David, thanks! Would you please also change the default of the make_tweakreg_catalog function here, for clarity?

It would also be good to run a regression test, as it's certainly possible this change would have a small effect on the solution coming from tweakreg.

@drlaw1558
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looks good David, thanks! Would you please also change the default of the make_tweakreg_catalog function here, for clarity?

It would also be good to run a regression test, as it's certainly possible this change would have a small effect on the solution coming from tweakreg.

Done! Not sure how to set off regression tests though.

@hbushouse hbushouse added this to the Build 11.0 milestone May 18, 2024
@hbushouse
Copy link
Collaborator

@hbushouse
Copy link
Collaborator

Regtest run shows small, expected differences in level-3 imaging products, due to slight differences in tweakreg results. So I think this looks OK.

@hbushouse hbushouse merged commit e915bb2 into spacetelescope:master May 18, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants