Fix supplier bug #101
Merged
Fix supplier bug #101
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Because the supplier requirement can be satisfied by either the originator field or the supplier field, the test logic needs to be revised. Signed-off-by: John Speed Meyers <jsmeyers@chainguard.dev>
The supplier logic actually requires looking at both the supplier field and the originator field. Signed-off-by: John Speed Meyers <jsmeyers@chainguard.dev>
Signed-off-by: John Speed Meyers <jsmeyers@chainguard.dev>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
yong-aan
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2023
|
Thanks, @linynjosh! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #100
The supplier logic needs to be changed for the reasons described in the issue.