You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A user on Bitcointalk was trying to import their now defunct BRD wallet in to Electrum. After entering their seed phrase and hitting the "Detect existing accounts" button, it found their legacy account, which contained a transaction history but not their coins. After some investigation it transpired that BRD sent the change from their m/0' legacy account to change addresses in their m/0' segwit account. The user in question had not used any of the receiving addresses in the segwit account.
Since the "Detect existing accounts" button only scans the first 20 receiving addresses, and no change addresses, it did not pick up the coins in their segwit account. After some confusion, the user in question finally tracked down their coins by manually entering the script type and derivation path.
I'm sure BRD will not be the only wallet which does this, and it could happen again with other wallets and other address types in the future. Is it worth having the "Detect existing accounts" button scan the first few change addresses too? I don't see any real down side to this - it would only prolong the wait after clicking said button by a few seconds, and places minimal additional load on servers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fun fact, this is another scenario not foreseen by BIP39/BIP44:
Address gap limit
Address gap limit is currently set to 20. If the software hits 20 unused addresses in a row, it expects there are no used addresses beyond this point and stops searching the address chain. We scan just the external chains, because internal chains receive only coins that come from the associated external chains.
A user on Bitcointalk was trying to import their now defunct BRD wallet in to Electrum. After entering their seed phrase and hitting the "Detect existing accounts" button, it found their legacy account, which contained a transaction history but not their coins. After some investigation it transpired that BRD sent the change from their m/0' legacy account to change addresses in their m/0' segwit account. The user in question had not used any of the receiving addresses in the segwit account.
Since the "Detect existing accounts" button only scans the first 20 receiving addresses, and no change addresses, it did not pick up the coins in their segwit account. After some confusion, the user in question finally tracked down their coins by manually entering the script type and derivation path.
You can read the thread in question from this post onwards: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5391541.msg60057185#msg60057185
I'm sure BRD will not be the only wallet which does this, and it could happen again with other wallets and other address types in the future. Is it worth having the "Detect existing accounts" button scan the first few change addresses too? I don't see any real down side to this - it would only prolong the wait after clicking said button by a few seconds, and places minimal additional load on servers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: