Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to py3 style type annotation: sphinx.testing #6555

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jul 6, 2019

Conversation

tk0miya
Copy link
Member

@tk0miya tk0miya commented Jul 6, 2019

Feature or Bugfix

  • Refactoring

Purpose

@tk0miya tk0miya added this to the 2.2.0 milestone Jul 6, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6555 into 2.0 will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              2.0    #6555      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.77%   83.78%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         266      266              
  Lines       40806    40814       +8     
  Branches     5981     5981              
==========================================
+ Hits        34187    34195       +8     
  Misses       5296     5296              
  Partials     1323     1323
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sphinx/testing/path.py 88.05% <100%> (+0.55%) ⬆️
sphinx/testing/fixtures.py 85.58% <100%> (+0.26%) ⬆️
sphinx/testing/restructuredtext.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
sphinx/testing/util.py 91.89% <100%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9e9cc79...1c6a279. Read the comment docs.

@tk0miya tk0miya merged commit 59c9336 into sphinx-doc:2.0 Jul 6, 2019
@tk0miya tk0miya deleted the refactor_type_annotation_testing branch July 6, 2019 05:55
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant